Wednesday, September 12, 2007

You Better Start Swimming Or You'll Sink Like A Stone

... For the times they are a changing."

(This comes from the introduction of a recent speech I made to an audience of start up marketers at McHenry County College. It has a few seeds which I want to preserve for cultivation later on... gj)


"Remember the song? Driving my daughter to High School last week, she put the CD in the dashboard player. I smiled when I heard the song. "I didn't know you liked Bob Dylan," I said. She smiled. "Of course! Everyone likes Bob Dylan dad."

Then it hits me. It's 6:30 AM and I realize Bob Dylan is a very successful marketer. Indeed, we might listened and learn:

* Successful marketers know how to swim!
* They know what it takes.
* They have learned to kick hard while under water.


For start up marketers the truth of these lyrics couldn't be more succinct.

* You'd better start swimming, or else!
* Start ups must be on target with their product strategy.
* They have to know exactly what they want in planning, spending, and doing the right things.
* A start up company must be smart, or lucky (or both).
* The stats: one out of five make it.

Then there are the more grown up corporate realities on marketing: The average tenure of a CMO (Chief Marketing Officer) is now less than two years; Ditto for the average agency relationship with clients; Most major metropolitan newspapers are scrambling to maintain their franchise (attempting to reinvent themselves online due to falling readership; And, few family firms survive past the first generation.

Better start swimming or you'll sink like a stone!

Here's more:

* The internet is now the fastest growing advertising medium in the world.
* This year brought new pressure on the up-front market. First time ever another medium has put pressure on TV spending.
* Consumer generated media is all the rage. Consider the rise of Blogs, Facebook, YouTube, wireless computing, and Google's unbelievable run.
* Not to mention the long tail (more on this later). Now we have the long tail of the internet to consider
* The internet has brought unprecedented change.
* Technology now allows us to do things we could only dream.

If there's a point that I want you to remember it's this: marketing is very serious business. It always has been serious. But it is even more so now. For the times they are a changing!

Sometimes I think clients often continue to react to marketing as if it is just fun and games. Big mistake. Great marketing is resolute. Great marketing is supported by strong data and analysis. It is the product of a well founded strategy executed with passion and intelligence.

When you "go to market" you're placing a substantial bet on the future.

Tonight we're going to talk about how to swim. How to go to market. What to worry about, etc. Yet, we're also going think about changing times."

Thursday, August 23, 2007

How To Leverage The Positive Perceptions of Email Newsletters

Email newsletters are much more than mere "SPAM."

Growing evidence suggests that email users are bonding to their online subscriptions. Done well, with concise copy and compelling content, an email newsletter program can build better relationships with customers than any other single enhancement you can make to your current website.

According to The Nielsen Norman Group (NNG) Report on "Email Newsletter Usability," online subscribers can often experience very emotional and positive reactions to email newsletters (see http://www.nngroup.com/reports/newsletters/summary.html).

Indeed, this significant finding is good news for marketers who want to enhance their online relationships. The emotional attachment people feel with email newsletters can create a stronger bond between readers and companies. More so than anything a website can achieve. When users glance at a website, their immediate task or question reins supreme. Users want to get in and get out of a website "as quickly as possible."

Not so with Email newsletters, which "...feel personal because they arrive in users' inboxes and users have an ongoing relationship with them." In fact, according to the NNG report, the email inbox is "information central" for most of us, a special place where we check for personal messages and mail.

Here's a few points to remember when designing an email newsletter:
  • Though people are emotionally attached to email newsletters, there's so much traffic, the stress of processing the mailbox continues to make them wary;
  • Skimming is the "dominant mode" of dealing with a cluttered inbox. Over 69% of readers skim the contents rather than read each issue.
  • Only 23% of email newsletters are read thoroughly.
  • With so much to read, a rigorous edit is needed so readers can scan the contents. The writing style needs to support readers who will focus on a limited portion of the layout.
  • Be relevant, address specific needs with work related news, professional tips or advice, events, prices, deadlines, sales, premiums, important dates, personal interests and hobbies (remember, this is a personal medium).
  • Your attitude counts a great deal. An email newsletter that's a pain to use, unsubscribe from, or that comes in too frequently, can create real animosity. Never attempt to trap the user into accepting your email newsletter or keeping them from dropping out by making the unsubscribe link hard to find. It's far better to let them go and focus on building a quality permission based list.
How do you gain subscribers in a saturated market?

Your pitch to the reader should be made from a position of strength. Place your new Email Newsletter in its rightful place of importance and support it accordingly. Commit to a regular publishing schedule that's not too frequent. The emotional engagement of readers is a precious commodity, offering strong potential. Don't take it lightly.
  • Your best prospect may be someone who is literally waiting to hear from you.
  • Make his life a little bit easier, better, or more profitable.
  • Let him know that your email newsletter will be easy to read and use.

Friday, August 17, 2007

Notes to a Copy writer on advertising

Dear Copywriter,

It’s never so easy.

Here’s a few thoughts.

1) Bernbach once said: touch the emotions of the reader and you’ll touch their soul, etc. (or words to this effect.).

2) Try removing any mention of the company or brand name from the appeal, concept or headline and work directly with the subject, thinking only of the reader. You did this very well in our last project. In this case, the reader will see the logo in its place. We don’t need to push their name. Unless of course, a very compelling headline extols something about the brand that’s newsworthy (we can do this, but I think it will miss the essence of the product and what it means to the customer).

3) Try to make a little bit of magic happen! We need to introduce this product in a new way.

4) Capture the reader’s attention with a fundamental truth, stated memorably. If we can link a selling angle (USP) through the copy or subhead or positioning, so much the better. But even without a USP, let’s try to capture the magic of the product and build readership for the message.

Here are a couple of quick headline ideas that might be promising (suggestions only, they need more work):

* A few samples followed up on this
* Then I got back to the overall theme

You have a few nice starts, like the less is more headline. But we need a bit more search, or creative push. We need a memorable twist, but not too cute or clever. As a journalist, report on what the product will do. But be more intimate in style. We’re trying to capture the interest of a reader by appealing directly to her desires and self interest. We’re trying to capture a fundamental truth or essence on the “uniqueness of relationship between the customer and the product.”

If you feel totally stifled, try writing a very personal letter to a friend. Show lots of enthusiasm for the product and how it will make her feel better, help her do more things, or improve her health. Don’t even think of mentioning the client. Just capture the story in the most compelling way. That letter is likely to produce a few lines of copy and headline. Maybe a strong headline.

Remember, it’s the emotions of the reader we want to touch.


Greg

Monday, June 18, 2007

How To Fix Your Website, And Stay Grounded

Fixing your website is easy, right?

But, how are you going to stay grounded when doing this?

It's tempting to say: "touch the edge of your computer's main frame!" But no, I'm not referring to static electricity. Instead I want to reinforce the importance of staying grounded in your thinking when you plan a website, or revise one that's currently online.

Most clients fall into distinct categories of web development:
  1. Those who yearn for new applications, technology and dazzling effects;
  2. And those who want a more effective business tool.
Now, you may think we prefer clients who want new applications and technology. Yet, our practice tends to attract more practical, grounded business people who are less focused on pyrotechnics or dynamic functionality. In fact, most of our customers don't feel very romantic about the internet. Instead, they want sound methodology and analysis to provide a more profitable return on their investment.

We're happy to comply with their needs. After all, it's their demand that drives our business.

However, this duality can present a curious dilemma: Despite the growth of new media, desire for new technology must be considered in light of a site plan that's based on the appropriate use of today's resources. Right now, the web is the fastest growing advertising medium in the world, out pacing television, newspapers, magazines, radio and other traditional media (which still lead in market share, but the gap is narrowing). Many leading marketers are seeking a competitive edge in user generated content, wireless computing, video blogs, social networking websites, behavioral targeting, and the continuing evolution in search engine marketing.

Yet, website developers and clients often confuse methods and goals in becoming deadlocked or compromised for the wrong reasons on site development priorities. The rush for new database functionality, online video or multimedia may seem promising. Yet, basic navigational problems, obscure page designs or difficult information architecture may be doing more harm than good. It is here that a well grounded viewpoint can help.

The grounded business person will move carefully with a well development plan based on improved usability, well designed and informative product pages, better writing, and a solid navigational scheme.

We know of one construction implement manufacturer who was so caught up in a protracted redevelopment process that they let their site languish unchanged while the redevelopment effort bogged down. They're intentions changed from basic makeover to a bigger project that could have been done in phases. The impact in lost business may never be fully realized or known.

At times the rush to be with it by making use of the latest web functionality, may lead you down the wrong path. High tech enthusiasm may send the wrong signal. Though your next website should reflect a timely image, it may be more profitable to revisit the basics first. In essence if you stay grounded, you may be better off.

Here's what current usability studies tell us to address as a first priority:

  1. Fix the stuff that's broken. There's a good chance your language is drawn out and difficult to read online. Your photos may be too small or poorly lit. Try running a usability test of your current site with a small targeted group. You may be surprised to learn that the most important action items may not be high tech.
  2. Consider this: people don't spend much time with the first visit to a website (they move on quickly if they don't find what they're looking for). Because of this its important to design each main topic page as a landing page for your site. In supporting deep link visitors you'll need to think critically about the content on all of these pages. It is crucial to the success of your site.
  3. Check your navigation. Make sure it's consistent, well thought out and easy to use, with good descriptive text for labels and links. Each page title should match the link names. Many sites lose visitors through poor information architecture.
  4. Make sure every page communicates the essence of what your site is about. People will scan the page to make their decision to read further, or move on. Make sure they get the point quickly on every page of your site.
  5. Provide information that real users actually want. The purpose of a site is often obscured by the many creators and cooks who conspire to build it. The problem comes when someone pays a visit. Users want to know whether your services meet their needs, and why they should do business with you.
  6. Now that you have done justice to the basics, look to the burgeoning world wide web and its many high tech innovations. By staying grounded at first, you'll be in a better position to seize that new competitive advantage.

Tuesday, June 12, 2007

Draw Them In To Your Site With The Right "Scent"

Let me hit you with this one: Successful websites can be analyzed by understanding the visitor's sense of smell!

You think I'm kidding, right?

Yet, as crazy as it sounds this concept reflects scientific findings in human-computer interaction research which date back to the early 90's (a nearly pre-historic age in computer technology) at the Palo Alto Research Center in California. Back then Stuart Card and Peter Pirolli used the analogy of wild animals gathering food to better understand how humans collect information online. This led them to the concept of "information foraging." Hence the idea of information scent in predicting how people actually follow up on a spoor of data and then continue in following the path to hit upon the information they're seeking to find.

It's all so figurative, of course. But, that's what makes the analogy so appealing. You can't actually smell anything online (unless your computer keyboard becomes very dirty). But your eyes can translate what you're seeing and reading into a warmer feeling, which is akin to the scent a predator picks up as it follows a path to its prey.

The website developer's job is to make that scent appear when it should, to make it a bit stronger at every step, so the information forager continues on the right path and reaches his goal on your site.

There's an inversion of natural selection here. No prey wants to be caught; but your website does. You want your site to be easily found and captured. You want people to satisfy their quest on your site's pages and links. It's our job to make it as easy as possible. We want them to catch the scent of a successsful hunt and reinforce it as they click the links. To do this we make your site a nutritious meal (or even a delicious little snack) and allow the forager to sniff it out early as an easy catch.

Here are a few things we do to enhance the smell of success for information foraging:

1) Spend time on links and category discriptions. This takes some analysis and pre-production time, but it's very much worthwhile. With so many navigational options available through a search query, the hunter has too many choices at every step. She can loose the scent quite easily. There's work to be done here that you don't want to short-change.

2) Avoid using jargon and cute words that have no common usage or "scent." Slogans cannot be saught out ahead of time by people who don't know what they mean. Unless you have a universal household trade name, try to make use of short, common English nouns and verbs to in your headings, link names, navigational elements, and copy.

3) Keep it easy for the visitor to know where they are in your site at all times, and provide stimulating links and for them to continue their efforts in drilling down to interior pages and information that will satisfy their search.

4) Use informative product pages. Don't assume anyone knows your product names and model numbers. They won't know them or find them on their own. Too often product pages are nearly barren of any real meat (hence no real scent to smell).

5) Use great product photography with people shown enjoying product benefits. This helps the visitor identify with the information and understand how the product will help them.

6) Drawing the visitor with the right scent is a cummulative process. Make sure these message elements find their way into main topic pages as well as the "deep links" on your site.

Four Things Site Visitors Do Online That You Should Know

Today Web visitors use search engines as 'answer engines.' They have learned much about the World Wide Web and they now view it as a single, integrated resource (for a great discussion of this pick up a copy of "Prioritizing Web Usability" by Nielsen and Loranger). The result of this shift means they don't think or care very much about individual websites. Their information grazing habits have turned them into answer engine query animals turning stones to find digestible nuggets of information. Here are the four things they do when they visit your site:

1) They go to their preferred search engine and type a few descriptive words.

2) The look at the top listings of the search engine results page.

3) They visit some of the sites they find on that page, but leave quickly after a minute or two... at best.

4) They view most pages for less than half a minute.

With such pressure to communicate effectively, you'll want to avoid fluffy talk, vague language, misleading statements, or poor graphics and photography. You'll want to give them well written and concise information, and avoid the temptation to engage in a concentrated sales pitch. You'll want to make sure your site is lean, well designed, easy to navigate, and standards compliant.

This takes a fusion of marketing, research, strategy, creative thinking and some experience with usability studies on how people succeed in their tasks using the web, and how they fail.

Monday, June 11, 2007

How Scrolling Affects Your Website

Most Web users simply do not take the time to scroll down a web page, at least not very far down anyway. This may be disconcerting if you're a website publisher or marketer. It's likely you have worked hard on your site's content and delivered a lot of good material and data.

Did you do the right thing in developing longer copy that takes up several screens of information?

Or, should you start over with shorter pages which require less scrolling?

It is a question every site designer will consider at some point. Just how much information constitutes a page? Based on usability and tracking data, most site visitors don't scroll past the first screen of a landing page. Just over 40% of them remain for a short time on the first screen before choosing to move on, or back to the search engine results page (SERP) to click another link. For professional and business to business sites a higher proportion of users will take more time to investigate site offerings. In fact, more experienced web users will do more scrolling than people who are less comfortable on the web. The experienced user knows that important information is often hidden below the first screen on many websites. However, for any site geared to consumers, it's very important to think through the content that will appear "above the fold" (i.e. the top portion of a folded newspaper) on the first screen of the landing page.

This is a quick business. People feel pressed having to go through so much information. They're impatient in searching through web pages looking for what they need. Since most web pages offer up convoluted writing and limited information at best, users often make the right decision to keep on clicking instead of scrolling and reading. It is important to be there with what they want by providing well written headlines, subheads, and pin-pointed copy above the fold, on the landing page for their keyword query.

Eliminate scrolling, or use longer copy? What's the best approach?

Shorter pages can be seen and assesed more easily. Yet genuine in-depth content requires longer treatment. Learn the proper way to engage the visitor with strong opening copy. Make sure the first two sentences effectively introduce and summarize what the page offers. Make good use of text links within the content so your visitors can find related information easily without leaving your site or returning to the search engine results page.

It's in your interest to keep them engaged and interested. Additionally, don't be shy in helping them find your product or service offerings. You must know how to present good copy headlines above the fold to gain their interest and engagement.

Thursday, June 7, 2007

Targeted Searches Have Defined User Needs, How They See Your Site, & What They Want to Find

We used think about a website in a different way that we do today. It used to be that we were expecting people might visit our site, bookmark it, enjoy visiting, etc. But in truth, that's not the case, according to recent usability studies.

Instead, the web today is one vast integrated resource for users who are not looking for sites to visit. Instead, they want answers to immediate questions, often isolated pieces of data or information, such as how long it took Lewis and Clark to reach the Pacific. Or, where can I find the best price for the new ipod. Or, give me a nice hotel in San Francisco this weekend (as searched in google or yahoo, and not through Expedia).

For most users this targeted search activity has redefined how they use the Web. They seek focused information, usually the stuff that's found on the interior pages of sites, with no stop-over for the home page, and very little use or exploration beyond the immediate need or task.

In old days, before 1994, prior to the development of modern visual browsers such as Mosaic and Netscape, a few people used the Internet to find articles, technical information and arcane bits and pieces of research. There were perhaps, 30,000 websites on the Web. The idea of visiting a site for entertainment, pleasure, or a visual tour of a hotel room, or any other kind of "visiting" simply did not exist.

Today, we have gone full circle. In the aggregate, users worldwide hit the web for specific answers and don't bother to bookmark anything at all. Their loyalty is to a search engine, used primarily as an answer engine which can dredge up an endless numbers of interior web pages to address an immediate need or task. The user simply doesn't care about the sites themselves. This kind of behavior, called "information foraging" has allowed users to search out information by through keywords more easily than by sticking with one site and exploring the links.

Much of what exists on the web is out of date in this sense, not because it is unattractive or unprofessional looking. Instead, it just does not meet visitor needs quickly and simply. Visitors are not going to browse. Instead they arrive at a page, find what they need, and leave. Maybe twenty or forty seconds in all. No further visiting, fun as that may be. It's more like this: here they are. Now they're gone.

You cannot change their behavior, but you can redesign you site to catch the bird when it's in your hand.

Ask yourself, do users quickly find what they need on the interior pages of your site? Do you show them text based links within the content area for related choices or more information? When you give away free information, do they find your product shown immediately and clearly as the solution to their need? These links (called"Also See" links) can be placed strategically within your site, on each and every page, to keep them reading and discovering what you have, both for the intrinsic value of the information and for the main selling points of your product.

This is where usability, information architecture and page design naturally flow into each other. It is the place where search engine marketing resides. Natural, organic search results derive from the way you present your content, the link names you use and the way in which your site is designed.

In the pre-Mosaic age the web was a network of information where the base unit was an article about a certain topic. It was not about websites per se.

Search engines have become the user interface to the world's abundance of information. This is good news for users, who merely spend a few minutes making their query in a brief string of key words to find what they need. Unfortunately for the marketer who is building a website, this is not necessarily such a good thing. But you can set a course to take advantage of how today's web is being used.

As they once said in the stock market, "don't fight the tape. Make the trend your friend."

Friday, May 18, 2007

The High Price of Bad Writing. How It May Cause Your Website to Fail

The power of effective writing for the Web has been recognized as more marketers strive to create sites reflecting higher standards of usability.

Yet, despite this good news, there's an overwhelming abundance of bad writing on the web. Convoluted prose, complex paragraphs, repeating phrases and vague navigational elements may cause visitors to abandon pages that might have the information or products they want, but which they're not willing to wade through to find.

Here's a few points to remember:

• Effective web writing... is clear, concise, descripitive. It reflects and reveals interior contents and site purpose.
• Ineffective web writing... is repetitious, complex, convoluted and wordy.
• Bad web writing... is disorganized and poorly written, to the point where visitors fail in performing basic tasks.

The irony is bad web writing may be rhetorically admirable, well informed, and possess an interesting style or personality. This comes from a distinction between pixels and printing. Whereas we're conditioned to read printed books, articles, and magazines in a linear, sometimes reflective consciousness, the web is about delivering usable data and nuggets of information that visitors are actively seeking. Usually, their quest is very specific and directed.

So, the writer's style can get in the way, even when the writing itself may work reasonably well in print (say in a book or article). Dump that article online and it looks daunting! A dense sea of text which fails to reveal its contents easily or quickly. In usability studies, visitors may navigate to right area of a site, only to find themselves defeated by a thicket of words. Sometimes the content is vague. When attempting to caraefully read through, many visitors simply don't get it, and leave the site.

You may be thinking, "this isn't true for me. Not for our site." However, you may want to recheck just to be sure. Sometimes site managers and content experts are too close to what they're doing. They don't realize the phrases, acronyms, common industry terms, or products they work with everyday, may not intuitively easy or accesssible for others. Also, attempts at clever writing, metaphor, lengthy descriptions and examples often break down on screen, as visitors lose their patience.

Great images help.

Good design helps.

The right words help.

Especially when you get to the point right away.

Thursday, May 17, 2007

Effective Writing for The Web

Writing for the Web is very different than writing advertising copy or corporate white papers. Web visitors surf and search with specific goals. They scan for simple descriptive labels. They make decisions quickly. They avoid complex, busy pages, with confusing labels and link names. They're impatient with over-written copy that's boastful or filled with marketing hype.

Some direct mail writers do poorly at first in this new medium due to their hard sell conditioning. Yes, product benefits should emerge. But the writer must remember the visitor is already in search mode, looking for solid, creditable information. He's landing on the site, fully prepared to investigate; she's predisposed and ready to learn. They want technical information, product comparisons, frequently asked questions, etc.

This is not the time to hit them over the head with your marketing. When people enter a query, they end up with a "million hits" on their desktop. Their first task is a ruthless leap through the pages they don't want to see. And, these days it doesn't take long. Usually, a smart marketer has figured out how to design, write and optimize a site with great usability factors, one that ranks high in the search engine response pages.

The short of it: if your site won't satisfy; they won't stick around (assuming they even find your site).


Style Tips

Serve up the major point of each page in the first two sentences.

Give 'em text bullets, short sentences and short paragraphs. Get to the point!

Wednesday, May 9, 2007

Support Deep Link Visitors to Your Website. Here's Why

An important aspect of web usability has to do with the "deep link" and what it may mean to the success of your website.

A deep link is the initial visit to an interior page made by a new visitor. Instead of entering through the home page, these visitors will see an interior page through a search engine or third party link.

What's important about this? According to Jacob Nielsen and Hoa Loranger in their landmark book, "Prioritizing Web Usability" deep links account for nearly 60% of initial page views. Additionally, the visits to the interior pages account for an average of 60 seconds, well past the 20 to 30 second average for the typical home page.

The important thing for you to remember is to actively support this characteristic of the web. Don't fight it, as many still do, because you're proud of the home page and want everyong to gain access to your site through the "front door." It's virtually impossible to control where the traffic will come from. As the old stock market saying suggests, "don't fight the tape; make the trend your friend."

Many rich sites are akin to a house with a thousand doors. Deep linking will enhance usability of your site. It gives visitors a chance to find the very nugget of information, or point of discuassion, their looking for. An unmediated, inside scoop direct to the most cogent page. Why try to control their access to this information? Deep links enhance usability "because they are more likely to satisfy user needs." A generic link that takes someone to the home page of a site is often less useful than a direct link to an article, or a product, which is the real subject of the search engine query.

Supporting deep linking is not a difficult thing to do. But you must consider this aspect of your site when you design it and build out the site.

Better still, when you create your strategy for search engine optimization, you should consider which pages on your site are the most useful and optimize them accordingly. You should encourage search engines and third party sites to link directly to these high content, high value pages, the ones that address specific issues.

You'll end up with more traffic, more satisfied readers and visitors overall.

Friday, April 20, 2007

Why Your Next Website Should Comply With The New Standards

There's a major shift in the media world which you may not be following closely. It goes like this: the old rulers of media are losing ground to internet media (the new rulers). I know. It may not be so earth shaking. You already know this to be true, right? However, what you may not realize is the extent to which the ground is shifting, and how fast.

Today's stock market report on the Tribune and Los Angeles Times reports more red ink. Just when they thought they were getting a handle on their online ventures (local websites) in stemming a losing tide and repositioning their brands, etc., more bad news comes along: Jobs, Autos, and Housing sectors, which were deemed to be on a gentle upswing, are clearly not showing the expected stabilizing trend.

Now, as a marketer you may be saying, "so what? I wasn't planning to do more newspaper advertising anyway." So be it. It may be incidental to everything else for your company right now. Yet, I think the current media picture is also suggesting a bit more than this.

The web is no longer a playground of experimentation. It's now solidly established as the main thoroughfare of news, personal communications, entertainment, texting, mobile computing and wireless technology, etc. It is now the dominant (if not dominating) media growth trend in the U.S. and the world.

So, here's a question: Have you changed your marketing approach to take advantage of this trend? Or, have you been slowly sticking your toe into the online waters? If you have been pro-active, is your web presence reflecting the new standards of usability and complaince?

If not, do you realize the price you may be paying for the delay in redoing your web presence?

When you click on a search link in Google or Yahoo and proceed to a website... hosted somewhere, anywhere in the world... and find the exact nugget of information, or the product you're looking for (at the right price), you experience the web at its best, as a medium conforming to high usability standards and compliance. Your search was seemless, and the results page satisfied your query with an appropriate ranking of relevant information.

Assuming the site you visited met your needs, for the information you needed, the download that took place, or the product you purchased, it will have been in large part due to the new standards of web development that have taken place in the last few years.

Now, statistically, only a few sites truly perform in this way. A very large majority of the millions of sites created and hosted, in the last five to six years don't satisfy the criteria set forth by the WC3 (World Wide Web Consotium). They do not use XHTML architecture, or CSS style sheets for design. They use bloated code, take a long time to download, and are largely inaccessible to people with disabilities. These sites simply don't fare as well in the search engines. In a CSS driven site the structured markup makes the site more friendly to the search engine spiders.

So what happened to all those other sites? Where were they during your search query?

For the most part, these sites appeared in the anonymous listings that fell below the top ten as ranked by Google, MSN, Ask.com and Yahoo.

Yes, they're still there. Perhaps the site publishers still think of them as a great bargain.

Tuesday, April 17, 2007

Trusting Your Gut Instinct

It's soooo "scientific" these days, trust your gut! Of course, you won't get promoted. But you'll feel good.

Just finished reading another Email Insider by David Baker (11/20/06 from Media Post). I really should stop reading them. There must have been a rash on getting past the data measurement fix at Media Post (http://www.mediapost.com), which may be putting some direct marketers into the Constant Spin Cycle.

Baker's core message in, "Don't Believe Everythng You Hear," deals with the unmasking of Urban Legends in E-mail Marketing. For example...

• He takes on the one about putting all of your content on the top left of the preview pane. Yet, it's not so air tight as it may seem. What's the Reality? "Test different layouts," he says.

• Then, there's the one that says, "don't put your main content below the fold." So what's the reality behind this Urban Legend? If it's just clicks you're using to measure success, think again. Maybe you should consider measuring sales, or leads, or opens over time and put the content where it works best in the final analysis which may be above, or below, the infamous fold.

• Finally, there's the legend on long copy, which says that all copy must be short, that no one has time to read anymore, etc. Yet, as long as marketers continue testing copy length, they'll rediscover the truth about long copy, that it often performs much better than short copy.

Okay. So the data can take you only so far.

Innovation is the art of doing something unexpected, finding new patterns in old things, engaging the reader or vistor. The value of your product of company may require longer treatment. If that's the case, you can chalk it up to "good writing and solid content" which translates into more copy, e.g. the old direct mail mantra: the more you tell the more you sell.

I guess you can trust your gut if it's working properly. However, maybe it's not such a good idea if you haven't got any gut or instinct, or hunch to invest. We tend to forget this point. The fixation on data happens because many otherwise bright people won't automatically know which way to go next, without a few objective correlatives to fall back on.

Data is what the brain wants to see when it comes time to analyze.

Information is what we use to confirm our gut instinct.

It' okay to trust you gut if you take the time to become well informed. That's why measurement is so important. Why scientific analysis should be done carefully, each step of the way. Why you should read widely in the emerging field of internet marketing.

With regard to the web, on-going usability analysis has emerged on the study of interfaces and how people use them which are nearly immutable.* Yet, on closer inspection, you'll see many points of analysis and observation which are changing, as the technology changes, as people become more accustomed to using the web.

This too becomes of primary importance to the practice of email marketing. We may have reached a point where the fascination with metrics and analytics has nearly driven everyone mad with an over-abundance of conclusions which have not necessarily been confirmed as universal.

There's still a whole lot of learning going on.


*See "Prioritizing Web Usability" by Jakob Nielsen and Hoa Loranger, from New Riders Press

Friday, April 13, 2007

Friday the 13th Musings On Metrics and Data

It's Friday the 13th. I'm closing up. Ready to go home and enjoy the weekend with my family.

Perhaps we'll see re-runs tonight of the old slasher movie which has memorialized this infamous Friday. Is it Freddie Kruger or Michael Meyers? I don't know which one to worry about. That's my problem I guess.

It's also true that I may be running the risk of appearing contrary to e-mail marketing and the chase for data supremacy. This 'losing the forest through the trees' stuff in my last post may make some you smile at me as naive and out of step. Especially with my last posting to this space. But, I've got to follow up once more. The subject of harvesting data, perhaps at the expense of strategy, remains unresolved. Which is probably useful to me in continuing to pique my curiosity.

Today I found one more "Email Insider" article from Media Post (11/16/06, by Amy D'Oliveira entitled "Going On A Data Diet") while wandering through my little binder of good stuff. She brings three points to the table on how to differentiate between the "interesting 'so what' and the actionable 'now what'... when looking at all the performance data, and how to tell the difference. Here's her key action points...

• Define program succss measures upfront and identify the relevant metrics.
• Track these metrics over time and keep them consistent.
• When data mining, ask the hard question: "what will we do with this information to improve our program?"

With more information coming along so quickly and readily through the digital dashboard on emailings, you have a choice of how to analyze your data and what you're going to pay attention to it, based on your strategic goals. In essence, you still need an overall strategy to guide you in digesting all this information and fine tuning your program.

The abundance of data, now so quickly harvested, easily accessed and analyzed (correctly we hope) brings real prospects for automated marketing. But the essential questions shall always start with the customer and the individuality of their relationship to the product.

That's it. That part isn't going to go away any time soon. We're dealing with people and not just data. There is an essential level of psychology and understanding which must preceed, any key stragegy decision.

To investigate and ask questions, even if they're rhetorical, is compelling to my interest in writing these entries.

So, who's it going to be: Kruger or Meyers?

Which slasher do you fear the most?

Tuesday, April 10, 2007

How to See The Forest Through The E-mail

My thanks to David Baker for his insightful brief ("Simplify Your E-mail Marketing Programs," Email Insider, 10/2/06, Media Post). His article is one of several we have been keeping in a binder for internal discussion. This particular entry owes a lot to his comments.

Here's a quote: ""Many of you have patched together teams of multiple vendors: one for the business brief, another for the creative brief, an agency to build the e-mail, and then a provider to deliver your precious cargo. As a result, many programs suffer from the complexity... leaving no time for applied learning."

Or, as I might say more generally in expanding on this topic: technique for the sake of technique often contributes to needless complications and distractions. Even perhaps to the formation of bad marketing ideas.

It so happens, e-mail marketing thrives on technique. It's part of the nature of the medium. However, as marketers we must be concerned with the habitual chasing of 'best practice du jour.' Many benefits of marketing take time to develop. The voice and personality, not to mention brand formation, takes time. It should not be baked and served too quickly. Not if you want to achieve a sustainable competitive advantage.

In a world transifixed by technology, many marketers pursue short term gains at the expense of long term goals. It is common to see people chasing technique, when they should be re-asking basic questions along the way: what are we trying to do? What are we trying to share in this new space (e-mail) that will reinforce customer perception and branding? What is the goal of this particular campaign or e-mailing? What are the objectives we need to reach in meeting them? Why should the customer care?

Chasing returns is counter productive in the stock market. But what about the stock we place in the brands we trust? Is it not counter productive to chase too many short term gains? What if these gains end up diminishing how the customer perceives our product?

Too many trees may obscure the forest. Just because the analytics and reporting are built-in, doesn't mean you should live and die by them with such fervor in every e-mail. Relationship marketing is a carefully built process. To your customer or subscriber, the choices they make in opening your message, or in becoming "engaged" with it, may have little to do with the metrics of testing, which may better reflect the sender's obsession with tactics and instant gratification (test, test, test, with lots of measurement, too little strategy?).

Your customer does not live with technology in the same way you live with it. She is definitely not sharing the fixation on measurement. We must always remind ourselves that measurement is often part of a larger more subjective analysis. It may be ironic that testing obsessions can end up becoming symptomatic of a continual misuse of data.

Let me replay the five guidelines from David Baker (in paraphasing his originals):

1. Be clear about your goals and don't get confused between goals and objectives. They are not the same.

2. If there is not going to be a measurable value attached to your test results, why do it?

3. Test only what you will be able to act on. Why measure what you cannot change?

4. (Quoted verbatim from Baker's post): "Quantify response -- both in cost to attain and cost to manage. If you don't interpret this, it will be an empty open rate or click through rate."

5. Stick to a six-words in summarizing your reasons for each new campaign or tactic. If you can't say it simply, it may be too complex.

Friday, April 6, 2007

Three More Points On Preview Panes

No sooner had I finished yesterday's post on preview panes, than I ran across Email Diva's take on the matter (Melinda Kruger, 9/25/06, Email Insider, from Media Post). She suggests all email marketers should be optimizing for the preview, assuming that blocked images are the norm, by giving the reader a choice on whether to open or delete.

Seems simple enough. Just pack your punch in the upper left corner, work to get on the friend's or safe list with each subscriber, and consider using Goodmail for Yahoo and AOL subscribers.

On the first of these, the advice still has me a little bit concerned. Perhaps so few are truly doing this. It may not be the 'numbing down' of the same layout over and over again which I'm so cautious about. As Melinda puts it, "While we are all tempted to put a big image and graphic headlines at the top of the e-mail, it more often than not comes through as boxes with red Xs in the corners." She suggests you determine what makes your e-mail a must read and put those benefits top left. On working to get on the friends safe list the suggestion is to ask for this on the registration screen, in the welcome e-mail and in every single e-mail that follows. Then there's Goodmail certification. Here the advice is to do it so your e-mails can arrive intact. Kruger says, "Goodmail certification also allows copywriters to curtail self-censorship... free is no longer a dirty word."

While I like and admire the writing I see in the Media Post, I'm still a little worried about the standard advice, which seems a bit too much like a common recipe, something we all must do in the same way if we want to see results. If awareness advertising is the art of marketing and direct marketing is the science of getting people to respond and make decisions, then the science has trumped art. It is the science of direct marketing that is truly winning.

There's no question that permission marketing has a defined set of best practices. However, the more we follow each other, the less true innovation in format and style we'll see.

Maybe it's just me. But I'm concerned with the straight-jacket that seems to be emerging.

Imagine the same restrictions on a print brochure. Or, a commercial. As consumers of media, we would go a little crazy with the monotony, redundancy and repitition if subjected to the same execution, over and over again.

Fashion icon Diana Vreeland once responded to the question, "what is style" by saying "True style has an animalistic, steely whip."

Now that's light years from permission marketing. But, the essence of it seems bear consideration. Real style, in anything you can name, will always be derived from genuine orginality. The challenge for the creative person is to "find new patterns in old things."

But how can do this, with so much imitation of technique?

I'm looking forward to learning more about real creativity in e-mail marketing.

Thursday, April 5, 2007

Important Tips to Remember On Preview Panes

Though distinctly different approaches exist for marketers communicating with consumers, versus those who reach a business audience, it's a consistently held premise that HTML email must present a compelling design for the preview pane (that portion of the email interface that lets email readers partially scan their messages).

The reason is simple. Most readers use the preview pane to review their email before making a decision to open. If it ain't happening in the preview pane, you may as well anticipate a much lower open rate, not to mention click throughs to your site.

According to Kirill Popov and Loren McDonald in their Seven Steps to a Better Template, the issue comes down to a central question: "Does the email message deliver its punch in a space roughly 4 inches wide by 2 inches deep?'

The preview pane has been compared to newspapers, where the portion "above the fold" creates the impact for a newstand sale. If you're a publisher or an advertising agency, you're familiar with the idea of getting a compelling message across in limited space. For emails, this means packing as much information as possible up top, where the eye will see it quickly. Build interest and impact. Get them to click on anchor links to the text which follows, or simply use the upper left hand corner for a list of what's to follow.

Yet, or course, creativity doesn't stop on this point. Many designers now look at the top 200 by 300 pixels of an HTML newsletter or message, as a virtual banner. But this can lead to a uneven looking product for the reader, the experience of opening and reading an email can become so top heavy that there's not much flow to the content, or breathing room for the story that follows.

So as in everything else, the question of balance comes into play. Popov and McDonald suggest that you redesign your template for a more horizontal format and pack as much information up top. Yet, that leaves me wondering how conditioned readers will become to the repetitive stimulus. Will it be too much of a good thing? What about the newsletter or message that simply unfolds in an interesting way? What happens then?

As in everything, sometimes the exception proves the rule. Here's a quote from David Baker from the Email Insider (8/21/06) that says, "You e-mail should flow smoothly and be evenly distributed if your intent is for the reader to flow through content."

We think, that if you have an interesting story, you should tell it in an interesting way. This may mean toping up on flags, teasers, interesting link names, and anchor lists... or simply letting a great headling unfold into the story.

You'll want to use images carefully (with alt tags), especially if your are doing a business to business communication, since many email clients turn off the images by defalt.

Always think about what you're doing with care. Follow general trends carefully, but follow your instincts most of all.

Friday, March 30, 2007

Dear Manufacturing Client

It's been nearly a year since you authorized a monthly enewsletter program.

I was pleased to see you take the leap of faith in commissioning this assignment. The initial thrust produced a PDF attachment (two versions) which you asked us to produce in order to show off your portfolio of manufacturing solutions. A nice start, perhaps, but just the beginning. Sending personal messages from Outlook Express is not email marketing. I think you may have forgotten the original thrust of this idea, which is the start of a new marketing program. The PDF attachment was never intended to take the place of a scheduled HTML newsletter.

That's why I am writing this gentle reminder. A lot has happened in the world of email marketing. We have hit a continuing pause, or point of procrastination, which you might want to reconsider in light of the proven effectiveness of permission based marketing.

Since your authorization was signed, the marketing world has literally exploded. It is now generally agreed this form of "seamless communications with customers" is perhaps the most effective marketing tool ever devised. In terms of ROI it outperforms everything else (by a considerable margin).

You know me to be truthful and deliberate. However, I hope you will now forgive me for blunt statement: it's high time to forge ahead with the anticipated email newsletter program. The difference between this consistently produced publication and a down and dirty PDF attachement, is literally beyond discription. There are many benefits for doing it. As a relationship marketer (the definition fits precisely) you're in a position to iron out some marketing problems... and create a unique communications asset for your managers and company.

The seamless customer communications aspect of email marketing is driving the excitement. This, coupled with efficiency has enabled change. In manufacturing it's often called CRM or Customer Relationship Management ("marketing automation" is another key phrase), but the heart of this digital revolution is permission marketing, and the heart of permission marketing is email.

Right now B2B marketing is moving away from hard-nosed sales efforts to a more efficient permission based approach. I believe your company will benefit by moving ahead with deliberate speed. Permission marketing, CRM, "marketing automation" is driving everything right now... for large companies, medium companies, and smaller firms. Literally a sea change in business communications is taking place.

We have the right tool, in the right place, at the right time. But we're sitting idle.

Are you not ready to go forward? It isn't too late to establish a strong permission based marketing system for your firm. But we need to act now.

The world is moving very quickly.


Sincerely yours,



Greg Johnson

Thursday, March 29, 2007

How Many Ways Can You Spell "E-Newsletter?"

What?

So, it's not so simple.

There are many ways to skin a cat. Many fish in the sea. And, you have many newsletters from print versions to the electronic variety called enewsletters.

Think of how many ways you might do them (or even spell the word, with or without a hyphen). A successful enewsletter can be informal, formal, long, short; humorous, colloquial, cut and dried, filled with coupons and offers, devoid of coupons and offers, friendly, superficial, detailed, in-depth, frequent, infrequent, published regularly or whenever you get to it.

The only requirement, to paraphrase the late Somerset Maugham, is the enewsletter must "interest" the reader. But wait. Your enewsletter will also benefit from a regular schedule, a solid reason for being, and a steady dedication to the reader's self interest.

So what does your enewsletter look like? Is it breezy and short... Or, full of detailed information? How many ways can you do it? Have you ironed out the big questions? Have you arrived at a style that will last?

If you are a serious marketer with a point of differentiation in your product or service, this final question will become important. Style matters to nearly the same degree as subsance. Without getting lost in that question, you don't want to be re-inventing the program with every issue.

So here's a baker's dozen for important points on how many ways to spell enewsletter:

1. Maintain an attitude of simplicity in how you structure the program (which doesn't have to mean "Keep It Simple Stupid" or KISS), because the simplicity may be a subtle thing that helps you organize and express sophisticated content in a reliably consistent manner. Think of simplicity of structure as having a lot to do with your publication strategy. Simpicity of structure will help you maintain your enewsletter and keep it fresh.

2. Seek to surprise your audience or customer with interesting content. There is no substitute for this. It's the linchpin for permission marketing (see point numer 4). Few people will sign up (or opt in) for boring, illiterate, insubstantial or non-existant content. It just won't happen. Okay, so maybe a few friends or family members might humour you, but no one else will. You can hire a writer, or an firm such as ours to help you with this, but you must have good, interesting content in order to succeed at permission marketing. If that seems frightening, then you should a take a breath and think about where the digital revolution is going and how you may need to change. Your company or product is boring? Then perhaps you need to consider what made you get into the business. You might be surprised what a good writer, a bit of original research and a few interviews, and a commitment to talk to your customers on a regular basis can do for your company.

3. Design, graphics, typography, and color will help you outperform your competitors. Research has shown this conclusively with testing. HTML graphics based emails outpull text based emails. This happens over and over despite what people say about annoying ads, pop up windows, and download time to their email preview panes. Graphics make a big difference. You will need to understand preview panes, and where to put the most important message components.

4. Permission based marketing is everything. Your customer, or audience is paying for it on their ISP account. You must have permission to send. The sole reason is the value you're providing in the messages you're sending: the timely offers, the insider news they will be getting, etc. The reason YOU like it so much is that it's so much cheaper and efficient than all that printing and postage you were formerly having to pay for. Now, it's their quarter and they rule. You can't just send stuff, or do a Blast email to thousands of addresses. You will be following a new set of rules.

5. But don't forget to do some selling. It's okay once you have established good will, and the trust in you as a provider of valuable content. People realize the email newsletter has an objective or purpose. As long as you put their needs first, you'll have no problem with them coming on board for your brand. Just remember to put marketing before sales, and everything else should work out just fine.

6. Delivery is huge. Remember, this is a arena where technology is the medium. Personalization, subject lines, spam filters, working with lists, managing bounces, subscribes, unsubscribes, and feedback. This is where the right kind of technical support is so crucial.

Wednesday, March 21, 2007

Where For Art Thou New Creative?

Are you seeking new email solutions that can take you beyond delivery, list management and the burden of testing a hundred email filters?

Are you yearning for a little creativity to make your message more effective and engaging?

Yes, email marketing is technical. The mechanics and technology of the medium can inhibit our ability to see holistically, with fresh eyes. There's more than technique and applied science going on here. With so many challenges in optimizing for email clients, using spam filters, email audits, managing ISP black lists, opt-in lists, testing parameters, original offers, and key performance indicators, it is easy to lose your life in the passing days, evenings and weekends (if you don't watch out).

It's not surprising the marketing world feels the pressure to eliminate reduncancy, reduce costs and gain greater efficiency. It makes you want to stop creating the new wheels and submit to the tried and true in remaking the old wheels, or in using a retred when it's just too exhausting.

It's much like other forms of marketing in this regard. Originality requires sacrifice. You must pay the price for it. But the sheer weight of creation amid the pressures to 'get it done' takes some getting used to. And, the sparkle of something new may get lost or forgotten. The investment required for a new solution, may become truncated, or simply cut off all together.

As Bill McCloskey has said (Email Insider, Delivering on the Promise, August 9, 2006), "Generic images. Text chosen not for its impact, but for its ability to slip through spam filters. Copy with all of the subtlety of the ads in the back pages of comic books. Where is the email that impacts my life, makes me laugh out loud, furthers the brand equity I have with the product or service?"

He's right of course.

Where for art thou new creative?

Tuesday, March 20, 2007

The Long and The Short of It

Here's a debate: long copy vs short. Which pulls better?

Direct marketers have maintained for many years the efficacy of long copy: "The more you tell the more you sell."

But this advice doesn't sit well with image conscious (re. branding or awareness) marketers: "Please keep it short and sweet," they'll say.

You might ask, which pulls better? But there may never be a definitive answer that will please everyone. It's very contextual. I have seen clients go crazy at the idea of too much "verbiage" (the very use of the word giving you a clue to their feelings). Others cannot refrain from adding more to each paragraph until a fortress of compounding words has emerged. In both cases we must work to open them up. The right solution is likely to be a bit different than what the client may be thinking.

So, here's the long and short of it: always use the right words and the right length. No more, or less.

The right words must express themselves completely, in the right way. If it's a one step selling process (classic direct mail), you need the reader to make a decision. Every bit of language must act to overcome any resistance the reader may have, and the offer must be so appealing that the prospect wants to act (once convinced of the value and suitability of the provider). This kind of direct marketing takes some very good copy and copy length to achieve results.

Then you have the marketer who seeks to build impressions and brand preferance over time. Awareness advertising does not seek (in the same way at least) an immediate sale. The famous appeal by Nike for example, "Just Do It," is all the copy that fits. The right words were very short indeed.

What's right for your campaign, message or direct response effort? What will reflect the quinessential uniqueness of your brand? Are you intending to launch an email marketing campaign, with a commitment to regular publishing and website integration? Or, are you planning a more traditional use of advertising in order to build awareness, visibility and brand equity?

All of the above goals are quite legitimate and worthy. It is important not to confuse methods and goals. Keep it straight. Know what you want and how you are going to achieve what you are setting out to do. Understand your customer and the context in which they will encounter your message. If you do these things you won't have to worry so much about long copy or short copy.

The right copy will emerge in these conditions, if you let the right people and the right thinking prevail.

The Wham! Bam! Thank You! Email Marketing Glut

It's one thing to say there's too much email coming into your inbox, yet quite another to ask are you sending too much.

Why is that? Because email is digital marketing and digital marketing is email. The two are one and the same, when you get right down to it. There's really no end of people who want useful content, something to buy if priced right, something to admire, an interesting story, news about new products (or current products), reviews, tips, ideas.

Busy as it may be, cluttered beyond belief, over burdened to the point of denial, there happens to be an insatiable appetite for content well done, no matter how much much traffic in the channel.

So you shouldn't worry about the Email Glut. Unless you just don't 'get it' with regard to content. Then you may end up having more than your fair share of trouble. After all is said and done, you need to think about what you're sending. The message must have value, or the permission to send won't survive. You'll end up struggling endlessly with delivery. Blacklists shall loom large.

Now, that's not to say that a certain sector isn't going a bit overboard with excess. The frenzy for seemless contact with customers is nearly insatiable inside the retail market. Per David Baker, "especially in the trigger happy retail and entertainment spaces..."

Borders Rewards seems to have it down quite well. Once or twice a month for books that you might like. Very nice. But other marketers can't seem to get enough of the Blast. It's like an addiction for them. Just hit the button and... wham! Fifty thousand emails...

Is that how it is for you?

Do you have a digital voice that's unique to your brand (the oranization's unique personality), or do you have a commodity message that mirrors all of the other "stuff?" A me-too message full of "content" that anyone could be sending (and is sending all too often).

If you can't answer this question affirming the uniqueness of your online message, you may be at risk. Of course, you may focus on great coupons or discounts with each email. Is yours a deal that's too good to pass up? Then it's not so important to find that originality of voice. Your customer is not really expecting it. Just give us the good deal. Yes, that works just fine.

But what if your business is built upon a carefully crafted propositon? Something different? A brand apart?

Then it may be time to make original use of the three most important ingredients of email marketing...

Content. Content. Content.

Monday, March 19, 2007

Email Frequency Overload?

In "The Inside Line on Email Marketing" dated Monday, July 10, 2006 by David Baker (How Much Email is Too Much?) he laments the sheer weight of daily email as "out of control." Additonally, he raises the question: "how much email is too much?"

My own inbox presents a daily challenge. How to weight the good from the bad is not so difficult. I've found it relatively easy to sort the spam. Yet, it is difficult to read the opt-in emails I have requested, and give them their daily due dilligence. These messages quickly build up. I have little time to even scan them adequately. Yet, it's not surprising that I value them and want to see them continue, even when I can't give them the time they deserve.

Email marketing popularity is reaching a critical mass. Our clients enjoy discussing the channel while they consider their move into email marketing. They like the idea of the quick hits, rapid response and instant data... and the savings over what they once spent of mailings and printing. But, I think their also waiting. Is it all so safe? Will it continue as the mainstay, the very backbone of digital marketng? And, how much is too much?

As long as it works, we say. As long as it helps you engage, and helps the customer engage in interesting and useful content, then frequency should be a secondary concern. As Mr. Baker suggests, too many repeated messages can numb the customer or even fatigue the list. Yet this may not be so real, if you're sending a high quality mesage with appropriate emphasis (i.e. some repetition on main themes, but keep it reasonable).

We all know what that means.

Tuesday, March 6, 2007

What Made The Fruitstand Sell?

A short post before I go home tonight. It's been along day. Sump pumps in the morning, my car to the repair garage this afternoon. Websites under construction, in varied states of readiness.

I'm too am ready... to go home. Connect my son's iPod with the iMac (the upgrade to system 10.3 has not gone smoothly). So I'm ready to head for the door. Then all of a sudden I think, "Hey, the Blog!"

So here I sit, thinking of Fruitstands, a.k.a. the fruitstand theory of marketing. Had a thought to add concerning this ancient and venerable theory (something akin to a marketing darwinism). But it ain't quite so just yet. My brain pan is a little bit heavy.

The theory is simple enough: that many business owners think of marketing as they once thought of the lemonade stand they had when they were kids (the lemonade theory?). You set up the stand, place your merchandise on it, set your price and wait for business. Why it's known as a fruitstand theory I can't say. Unless people think of fruitstands as a more grown up substitue for the simple koolaid or lemonade kart. Perhaps fruitstands were an eary model of immigrant success. They were very simple: Sort 'em, stack 'em and price 'em, and you are on your way. (e.g. Dominick of grocery fame started out with a hot dog cart near Wrigley Field).

What I love most is how simple, logical and true to life. So many of our client seem to have the beloved fruitstand in mind when they start out (and some think of it quite foundly as representing their currentl vision).

I don't want to trash it for anyone. Simple is good.

Wednesday, February 28, 2007

Nothing Happens Until The Sale Is Made?

'Nothing happens until the sale is made.'

I have heard this one before. It is a comment refecting the importance and obvious personal pride of many sales professionals. Yet, I am left with a question. Is it really true?

They're the one's creating the opportunities and closing the sale through superior techniques, training, personal selling skills, etc. Of course, there is more than a little truth to this. Much of what we associate with corporate value, the company's intrinsic worth, can be boiled down to a magic number called sales. And many companies are completely lost without the dilligence and effectiveness of personal selling in all its forms.

Yet it leaves me wanting for more, as it does many others who concern themselves with marketing. Harvard's Ted Levine puts the counterpoint in succinct terms: "The goal of marketing is to make sales obsoete." Which sounds a little harsh (even to me). Must these two points of view exist in such stark polarity? Sales... Marketing... Sales!, etc. Each proponent quietly suggesting the other needn't make so much of itself. In many companies the two disciplines fight it out during every budgeting.

My own take on it is to say that we all exist on a vast ocean of economic activity which contains many fish, many shades of coloration and type. Lots and lots of species and organisms, thriving or not depending on the conditions of the hour. One such company completely depends on sales activity to generate its bottom line; anothr seeks it through effective marketing with far less attention paid to having a salesforce to differentiate itself. There are so many ways to see this happening, in the vast expanse of so many companies, selling B2B or B2C, through intermediaties and channel partners, with high tech goods and services which require a lot of presentations to simple products offers sold direct. Way too many fish to categorize so easily.

Yet sales can be misplaced in making the point of emphasis that nothing happens until a sale is made. Because it is the outcome that everyone wants, it becomes a fixed center in how the thinking is done, where the thinking starts and how people imagine their 'sales and marketing.'

I have come to appreciate Ted Levine's famous line, i.e. marketing if done effectively will sell the product so well you won't need a sales force. The product sells itself.

Tuesday, February 27, 2007

Mere Sales

As mentioned in my previous postings, I have spent a long time before the mast in marketing. I want this blog to say more things, or convey more thinking, apart from incessant handwritten notes I have kept for years.

In summary what have the preceeding two posts conveyed? EEOS... Energy, Excitement, Opportunity, Sales? It sounds too jingoistic to be serious. Yet, it seems the effort we put into the creative, in the strategy and everything else, that a marketing program has to produce a strong benefit. And for the millionth time as we dutifully sound the note, "increased profits and growth"... well how many times can we say with a straight face? Is it truly all about money?

I think it actually goes further than this. I've come to think that if anyone asks me what they should expect from a successful marketing engagement, I would say: "You should feel a strong uptick in the energy level inside your company. The program should produce excitement in your staff and customers. It should be timely and real (there's got to be a market for the product or service). With these things in place, you should feel confident about sales (though nothing is inevitable or guaranteed).

It may not rank as high as theoretic physics, quantum mechanics, or anything so noteworthy. It isn't very profound. Yet, when they ask what to expect, tell them: Energy, Excitment, Opportunity, Sales.

See if there isn't a spark of recognition. Perhaps a smile?

Saturday, February 24, 2007

Next up Excitement, is also part of the EEOS

And so it would go, that after Energy, the enterprising marketer would look to have some excitement from her marketing. The next rung, or step on the acronym implies a relationship to the Energy put into a program or marketing initiative. Hopefully this is a reasonably creative effort, so something new or innovative is going on. Otherwise it's tough to find any Excitement, "Hey, we're doing some advertising today!" ???

Well maybe not. Let's try something else. An enewsletter? A Blog?

Okay, perhaps we're getting little bit warmer, a bit more exciting with this. We think there's also a sequence here, an emotional connection, or cause and effect, or formula: "If we put in a bit more Energy into this marketing (which can be quite broadly defined to include the product development stuff), and we do it in the right way so our investment of Energy pays off with a good idea, or a special insight into something our customers will value, we'll see this right away in a quality or tangible product feature that's differentiated in its benefits. It will be exciting to see this or discover it."

Then the marketer can go off and really celebrate this discovery. Feel some excitement.

Of course, it could also just be a really good marketing idea. Either way, the Energy is an investment (did we say that this could also be the dollars we have put into it. Money is a latent form of Energy) that pays off in the Excitement generated by the idea.


Opportunity

Now we have the very next part of our sequencial acronym: 1. Energy, 2. Excitement, 3. Opportunity...

Well, let me come clean here. This is not that serious is it? I'm just having fun after all. Yet, thirty years of marketing before the mast (the creative side of marketing communications and advertising) provides me with a decent enough excuse or cover for having some fun. And, maybe it makes some sense as well.

I believe the first two emotional connections, the investment of Energy, and the Excitement one feels on making a discovery, means very little if there's no Opportunity to match it or moment to be seized. There has to be some connection to a market of people who trade, buy or sell. If not, the Excitement dies down in a big hurry.

You have seen this. So have I. You present your idea to the prospect, client or partner and they say, "Yeah, but...." You feel the exciting atmosphere of the moment drain away in seconds. An Art Director stated this well (I can't recall the citation, please let me know if you recognize this one), after a particularly brutal meeting when his ideas were shot down: "Lions three Christians zero!"

Opportunity is a nautical phrase, "opposite the port," O Puerto, etc. You can imagine the chance of making the port to the leeward side with a fresh wind, a captain who calls it too late and you're suddenly past the point where you can sail into the harbor. Wait, there's a storm coming, oh shit!

I think that's the relationship to the Opportunity in businss and marketing. We've all had ideas. Some of them very good ideas. Yet without the capital (either money or human resources) the Energy isn't there, the excitement of waking up one night saying, "hey, this just might happen" doesnt' gel. No one is really getting it. the Excitement doesnt' spread.

How many ideas are like this? A passing fancy that one person thinks is great, but won't go anywhere. No real energy is generated. No excitement spreads.

Just one hand clapping.

Friday, February 23, 2007

What Do We Mean By EEOS?

I'm still trying to figure this one out. Though we've said it for some time. Our Agency, R.N. Johnson Creative Marketing has been using this acronym: "Energy, Excitement, Opportunity, Sales (EEOS).

It's not just the underlying physics or meaning for the word Energy, (although that may be enough to catch someone's interest). Energy is a by-product of successful marketing. It works both ways on behalf of customers and marketers. A good idea brings some energy with it. People work harder, etc. And, it can reach the customer via many points of subtle perception.

You've got to like marketing to think of it as imparting energy to a company or an organization. It has to be fun for someone to think of it in this way. Ben & Jerry's? The infamous Google? How many celebrated companies inspire their employees and stimulate their customers? A few good ones certainly. They almost all have very resolute marketing.

Then, this work Excitement comes in.